Comparison Mobile & Fixed Lasser Cladding Systems
To help you choose between a mobile and a fixed laser cladding system, we’ve created a comparison table.
Ultimately, the right choice depends on the size, location, and characteristics of the components requiring laser cladding. Mobile systems provide flexibility and cost efficiency for large, on-site repairs, while fixed systems are ideal for controlled environments, high-volume production, and the refurbishment of smaller parts.
|
Feature |
Mobile System |
Fixed System |
|---|---|---|
|
Component size |
Ideal for large/ immovable components |
Ideal for smaller/ transportable components |
|
Location |
On-site, remote locations |
Dedicated facility/ production line |
|
Logistics |
Minimal transport/ disassembly |
Requires transport of components |
|
Downtime |
Reduced downtime for large parts |
Potentially longer downtime due to logistics |
|
Flexibility |
Highly flexible for complex/ difficult access |
Optimized for consistent, repeatable processes |
|
Automation |
Robotic but not integrated into part handling |
Highly automated (CNC/ robotic) with integrated part handling |
|
Cost driver |
Reduced logistics/ downtime costs |
Efficiency and consistency in production |
Explore all our laser cladding system solutions — from full turnkey systems, to the Hive™ platform, and the Hornet Mobile™ system. Visit our Laser Cladding Systems page to learn more.